Are Churches Safe?

by a member of the Anglican Survivors Group

I write this small piece as a survivor of a clergy sexual abuse ring. I was a core participant in the Anglican IICSA inquiry and it took me over 30 years of fighting to get my abusers jailed.

One of the recurring memories of the abuse was desperately trying to report it and not being heard. The lack of ability to effectively report meant the abuse continued for many years.

The church has a long history of covering up abuse and allowing it to continue in order to protect the reputation of the church. Many instances were revealed publicly at IICSA, yet still to this day no one has been disciplined or sacked for their part in allowing our abuse to continue.

It was for this reason that many years ago a number of survivors, among them myself, approached the then-new head of the National Safeguarding Team, expressing how important it is for safeguarding to be clearly visible both on parish websites and in church buildings. When the Parish Safeguarding Handbook was published it included on p.2 the need to CLEARLY display on the FRONT page of parish websites the parish’s safeguarding arrangements.

The reason for it to be on the front page was so that the search engines would pick it up. Research from the NSPCC and evidence given to IICSA both confirm that many teenagers (and younger) have access to mobile phones and the first place they look for information is via search engines.

If the parish website just has a small hidden link to a document that only gives your policy, with no contact numbers, then you have missed the entire point.

Sadly, even to this day many parishes have nothing on their front pages, and many still have nothing at all.

Several years ago now, the same group of survivors started trawling through some 12000 websites. We found compliance with this basic requirement to be under 50%. We emailed and telephoned many parishes, most of whom weren’t even aware of the requirement. Very slowly, compliance started rising. But some parishes just refused.

Some used the “due consideration” loophole where they said they had given safeguarding requirements due consideration and decided not to do it. That led to a further campaign by survivors to close this loophole.

Eventually, after much chasing, we were left with just over 600 parishes against whom we issued CDMs. This was the wake-up call many needed. We agreed to withdraw the CDMs if the parish became compliant. Many however simply put up a copy of their policy. hidden on page 28!

Some parishes have the clergy as the Parish Safeguarding Officer or contact, which is totally unacceptable. Some churches share a safeguarding officer with other churches and at a parish level the officer is never present at church.

Sadly, there are some very evil people out there, including clergy, who will do the unthinkable. A successful DBS check may just mean that a person has not yet been caught. A DBS check doesn’t stop abuse: but good Safeguarding practice may. And one of the keys to that is that people are able to report things as soon as anything inappropriate happens.

Posters need to be clearly visible to all. They need to be understood by a child. They need to be at a height where children can read them.

The campaign led to some excellent diocesan responses. The Diocesan Safeguarding Adviser at Salisbury came up with a simple poster that simply said:

“Is someone hurting you?”
“WE CARE. Please call 01234 567890”

Safeguarding is NOT about an admin exercise. It’s not about traffic lights on a Diocesan dashboard. It’s about putting yourself in the shoes of a vulnerable child or adult.

We ask, as survivors ourselves, one simple question. If YOU were 10 years old and trying to report abuse, could you?

Comments

4 responses to “Are Churches Safe?”

  1. Mr Benjamin H Mackay avatar
    Mr Benjamin H Mackay

    I was abused as a child at school. The response was ‘Boys will be boys’. The school was under the auspices of the Church of England. When I reported inappropriate kissing and touching, the authorities also said “Dear boy, there are many Wonderful encounters in this school. You’ll grow out of it one day.”

    Safeguarding Matters. Every parish is responsible. Every person is responsible, and we all need to challenge things with which we are uncomfortable. There is a hymn which talks about “a touching place”. No. Not round abuse victims.

  2. David Hawkins avatar
    David Hawkins

    “We ask, as survivors ourselves, one simple question. If YOU were 10 years old and trying to report abuse, could you?”
    Please read this article from the Anglican Survivors Group if you are a member of the Church of England it is vitally important.
    I was a member of our Church Council in a German Anglican Parish and consequently had to undergo basic training in Safeguarding and I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that Church of England “safeguarding” is actually all about protecting the reputation and finances of the Church.
    After training I raised what seemed like the most obvious question. If I am a ten year old child being sexually abused by a priest or my own father, how do I get the confidence to tell someone. Who do I talk to ? How do I know my allegations won’t go straight back to my father ? What if I am simply deeply unhappy and confused about my identity and faith ? Who can I talk to ? Who can I trust ?
    I have to say that at my Church Council there was a total lack of interest and I think the explanation is very simple “safeguarding” is seen as the prevention of wrongdoing, the punishment perpetrators not our very clear biblical obligation to love and protect the vulnerable and the abused.
    Childhood and adolescence can be a very traumatic experience but the Church seems to care very little about extending love and support to children and young people.
    So should we be at all surprised that so many of them cease to be practicing Christians in their twenties and never come back ?
    The central message of the Gospels is Love. Why is there apparently so little love in the Church of England ?

  3. MariHoward avatar

    Why so little ‘Love” Maybe because the concept is misunderstood? ‘Charity’ is of course not used now but ‘charity’ is the word which translates from the original Greek in the New Testament, and its meaning – kindness, consideration, has become blurred alongside its now sloppy multitude of meanings. (INcluding ‘making love’ of course, ironic in this situation) And, in typical English families, how does ‘love’ function? How is it expressed, tradtionally? Boarding school – very English – is that very loving? No surprise we aren’t a kind considerate bunch… hence, the Church of England – and its emphasis on perpetrators not being found out, and victims blamed or simply ignored?

  4. John Davies avatar
    John Davies

    And then you have the fundamentalist attitude of ‘tough love’, based on ‘spare the rod and spoil the child’. As a youth leader, a father told me to tell him if his six year old son misbehaved in our group, and he would beat him for it. Oddly, I never had the least trouble with the lad (church elders’ children were a different matter) and most certainly wouldn’t have told his father if that would be the result! And, no, who could I go to, on such unsubstantiated evidence?

Any thoughts?