Thirty Years of Women Priests in the Church of England and Still Two Thirds of Paid Posts Are Held by Men


by Rev Martine Oborne, Chair of WATCH (Women and the Church), a group that works for gender equality in the Church of England

Suppose you are a senior leader of a major institution in the UK, two thirds of whose customers are female, and you are asked to set a gender diversity target for all the paid posts in your institution. You would probably come up with a figure of 50% for women or even more.

Now suppose that you work for a major institution in the UK whose customers are two thirds female and which publicly states that it is committed to all roles in the institution being open equally to all people irrespective of gender. Then you would probably be upset when that institution sets a gender diversity target for paid posts at 70% for men and 30% for women.

Welcome to the Blackburn diocese in the Church of England, which has set these gender diversity targets – apparently matching the national figures which, after thirty years of women priests, show men holding over two thirds of stipendiary posts.

I don’t know what the current statistics are for Blackburn diocese, because the Church of England has stopped producing gender diversity statistics since 2020. But in 2020 the Blackburn diocese was said to have 24% of its paid posts held by women. So it’s hardly a very ambitious target for this to increase to 30%. And, when we look at the small print more closely, we see that the target is not a percentage of all the posts available in the diocese but only of the ones that are open to women.

Confused? You may well be, but the situation in the Church of England is that, while it claims that all its roles are open to all people irrespective of gender, it still allows churches to pass resolutions saying they do not want a female vicar and they do not want to be under the oversight of a female bishop.

Blackburn Diocese’s recent Statement of Needs, which was issued when it was looking to appoint a new bishop, said it has 235 parishes and 30 of these have passed resolutions saying they will not have a female vicar. For 18 of these, this is because they do not think the Church of England has the authority to ordain women as priests. For the other 12 it’s because they believe God created men to be leaders and women to support them in that leadership in the Church, a theology which is referred to as Complementarianism but is also described, more accurately, as Male Headship.

So Blackburn’s target is 30% of a smaller number of posts than the 24% of a slightly larger number of posts in the official statistics three years ago. Which is hardly ambitious or encouraging.

But it’s not surprising. If senior clergy in Blackburn had any serious intention of increasing the number of female clergy in their diocese, then they would not have supported the recent selection of a diocesan bishop who does not ordain women as priests.

It will be said that the Bishop of Blackburn is highly supportive of women and has encouraged the appointment of many women to posts in Blackburn, but many female clergy will not apply for posts in a diocese where the Bishop overseeing them does not believe the Church had the authority to ordain them. And, furthermore, that bishop would therefore not receive bread and wine consecrated by them – even though he is happy for parishioners and others to receive their sacraments.

If the decision makers for this appointment had had any doubt about this issue, they might have researched the situation in the only other diocese in the Church of England that is headed by a bishop who does not ordain women: Chichester. Chichester has had the same diocesan bishop since 2012, two years before women were allowed to be made bishops, and he does not ordain women as priests. And I believe this is a major factor in why Chichester is at the bottom of the league table in terms of the percentage of women holding stipendiary posts. Again, we don’t have up-to-date official statistics but in 2020 16% of stipendiary posts in Chichester were held by women, 84% by men.

Talking with a senior leader in Chichester recently, I asked whether things were getting any better there for women. The leader told me that the statistics are probably slightly worse now, despite the fact that they were all working very hard to attract women and could not understand why more women didn’t apply for posts in Chichester. I suggested that the problem might be that many female clergy, myself included, would not take on a job in a diocese when the most senior bishop had any question over my ordination or my ability to consecrate the sacraments. And only when a fully affirming Bishop is in charge is this likely to change.

Goal 5 of the UN’s Sustainable Development Targets is to end all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere – recognising, among other things, that understandings of male privilege are drivers of abuse against women and girls.  The UN asks us to imagine what our world might look like if we achieved this by 2030. And I would say that, if this were the case, then the world would look a lot more like the Kingdom of God that Jesus proclaimed two thousand years ago – in which there is no last, no first, no lesser, no greater – but all human beings are treated equally.

The Church of England, as the country’s established Church, has the opportunity and responsibility to take a moral lead in ensuring the human rights of all people are protected. Women’s rights are human rights, and our Church cannot advocate for human rights while it has institutionalised discrimination against women and other groups – which legitimises sexism and sometimes abuse.

I was at a large meeting of female clergy recently and was shocked to hear story after story of putdowns and underminings, everyday sexism, that women were experiencing in the Church. They said they could not raise these issues with senior clergy for fear of being seen as difficult or moaning – so it was only in the safe environment of an all-female group that they were comfortable to share their experiences. Which, to my mind, is a very unsafe culture that the Church has now created.

Many women do as we are told and show so-called ‘gracious restraint,’ but this is wearing female clergy down and affecting their well-being. One woman, on the point of resigning her post, said to me, ‘Taken alone, each incident can be brushed off as not very important. But it’s like death by a thousand cuts and one day you realise that you are done.’

Let’s set some new targets in the Church of England for bringing about true gender equity and balance. First, to get rid of the institutionalised discrimination. And, secondly, to seek that 50% of stipendiary posts are held by women and 50% by men. I truly believe it is just that simple.

 

 

Comments

7 responses to “Thirty Years of Women Priests in the Church of England and Still Two Thirds of Paid Posts Are Held by Men”

  1. Brenda Wallace avatar
    Brenda Wallace

    Thank you Martine for continuing to challenge the gender inequality. 30 years on, there’s still such a long way to go.

  2. Anne Peat avatar
    Anne Peat

    How depressing! I’ve just been watching the Dimbleby Lecture, where David Harewood reflected on the Windrush Scandal and the toll that racial prejudice took on generations of black British. The Church of England would not dream of writing it into their rules that people of colour could not hold certain positions, but it’s apparently fine to say women can’t, or people of certain sexualities can’t. No wonder so many in this country no longer wish to have anything to do with ‘the national church’.

  3. Lizzie Taylor avatar
    Lizzie Taylor

    After coming up for a decade of trying to make it work, with much ‘gracious restraint’ being exercised by women and men who support equality, it’s clear that the 2014 Settlement foundation principles of trust and mutuality are missing, and the agreement has broken down.

    Martine has previously said that arrangements have only appeared to work through a combination of silencing and cover up. Succinct and fair.

    There’s a long list of areas where things are not working. Here are just some:

    – Lack of transparency on the part of churches that exclude women, about the existence, meaning and purpose of their PCC resolutions
    – Pronounced gender imbalance in clergy appointments
    – The gender imbalance is most pronounced in dioceses where the bishops historically and currently do not fully affirm women’s priestly ministry
    – Parishes complaining that consultations have been minimal, or the majority view has been overridden by the PCC
    – No evidence that resolutions are being reviewed at intervals in churches where clergy have not moved on and are not likely to do so
    – Alternative and subtly differing ‘Guidance’ and ‘Advice’ about passing resolutions published by third parties, and commended for use by churches
    – No requirement to cross-refer the priestly vocations of women in resolution parishes to clergy in other churches, who will support their discernment
    – Important recommendations by the Independent Reviewer in 2017 have not been acted upon
    – Appointments seemingly forced upon the Church, in ambush-style, without the above, and without appropriate national or local consultation with those affected
    – Over-representation of bishops who don’t fully affirm women’s ministry, in relation to the number of parishes seeking such oversight
    – Policy of acquisition of patronages, and concerning pattern of appointments, by some conservative evangelical patronage trusts
    – Questions and concerns raised by Lay Representatives in General Synod deflected and ignored
    – Proposed Adjustments to the Settlement brushed off by bishops, in spite of General Synod having foreseen the need for them and provided for them

    These are just some of the areas where it hasn’t worked. Bishops and other Church leaders have had problems referred to them, over several years. Problems have not been resolved.

    There’s no reason to believe this will change over the next decade. The Settlement isn’t functioning with integrity. It hasn’t worked.

  4. Cheryl avatar
    Cheryl

    The main reason I took early retirement because of ill health was because I have a medical condition that made it impossible to fulfil my role as I would wish or should be expected to. But as a woman of ’94 I did feel that one of the things that had worn me away over the years was the myriad ways one is chipped away at as a priest who happens to be a woman. It got worse instead of better, not perhaps in terms of the extent and ferocity of the experience but in terms of the fact it was still acceptable to tell me after nearly 30 years of ordained ministry (30 next week) that they would obviously have preferred a man, but for a woman I was OK, or that I was meant to feel grateful that a piece of pastoral ministry I had done had challenged someone who had been negative about women as priests and sitting in the congregation judging me to think again.

  5. Graham Holmes avatar
    Graham Holmes

    As the Archbishops Council has discovered the concept of RESET, perhaps they might be persuaded to use it to start from the beginning the relationships between ordained and consecrated women and the rest of the CoE, given how badly it was done the first time?

  6. Jan Allen avatar
    Jan Allen

    As a new Anglican convert and a women I cannot support the ordination of women priests, BUT accept that they are now here to stay.
    The Church is lost and has been ever since it turned away from scripture and started to bend to the whims of society.
    ALL should be loved and feel equal in Church, BUT we cannot and must not subvert, bend and twist His word to make ourselves ‘feel’ better while there.
    It is a challenge and a call to surrender and to submit to His will, not seek to bend His word to fit ours.
    I apologise if this offends anyone, it is not my intention. We must and can all stand together before Him equal in our sin and failure, yet all seeking to follow as best we are able.
    I dont presume to know His final will and potential judgement on anyone. I just truly believe that we have been given His word as a blueprint and we are asked to simply acknowledge this and do our best to follow it …

    1. Helen King avatar
      Helen King

      As a woman, I too used to reject the ordination of women, until I was taken through the point that the priest at the altar is not acting the part of Christ – otherwise only Jewish men of a certain age could be ordained – but representing His humanity. And it is Jesus, not the Bible, who is the Word of God.

Any thoughts?